[PATCH v3 1/1] gpio: omap: dts: Move interrupt-controller from #interrupt-cells description

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

On 03/26/2013 03:29 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 03:10 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>> Hi Javier,
>> 
>> On 03/26/2013 10:33 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>>> <javier.martinez at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> The binding documentation for the OMAP GPIO controller has the
>>>> "#interrupt-cells" property listed before "#interrupt-controller"
>>>> property but its description after.
>>>> This is confusing so we move "#interrupt-cells" after the
>>>> "interrupt-controller" property so is followed by its description.
>>>>
>>>> While being there, change the properties order to be consistent with
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt
>>>> and Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt.
>>>>
>>>> According with these docs, the order of the properties for a gpio-omap
>>>> device node should be:
>>>>
>>>>     gpio-controller;
>>>>     #gpio-cells = <2>;
>>>>     interrupt-controller;
>>>>     #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez at collabora.co.uk>
>>>> Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>   - Change the properties order to be consistent with the rest of the
>>>>     DT bindings docs suggested by Jon Hunter.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>   - Fix changelog that explained the opposite of what the patch was doing as
>>>>     suggested by Benoit Cousson.
>>>>
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-omap.txt         |    8 ++++----
>>>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-omap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-omap.txt
>>>> index bff51a2..a56e3a5 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-omap.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-omap.txt
>>>> @@ -5,12 +5,12 @@ Required properties:
>>>>    - "ti,omap2-gpio" for OMAP2 controllers
>>>>    - "ti,omap3-gpio" for OMAP3 controllers
>>>>    - "ti,omap4-gpio" for OMAP4 controllers
>>>> +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a GPIO controller.
>>>>  - #gpio-cells : Should be two.
>>>>    - first cell is the pin number
>>>>    - second cell is used to specify optional parameters (unused)
>>>> -- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a GPIO controller.
>>>> +- interrupt-controller: Mark the device node as an interrupt controller.
>>>>  - #interrupt-cells : Should be 2.
>>>> -- interrupt-controller: Mark the device node as an interrupt controller
>>>>    The first cell is the GPIO number.
>>>>    The second cell is used to specify flags:
>>>>      bits[3:0] trigger type and level flags:
>>>> @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ Example:
>>>>  gpio4: gpio4 {
>>>>      compatible = "ti,omap4-gpio";
>>>>      ti,hwmods = "gpio4";
>>>> -    #gpio-cells = <2>;
>>>>      gpio-controller;
>>>> -    #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>> +    #gpio-cells = <2>;
>>>>      interrupt-controller;
>>>> +    #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>>  };
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.7.6
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> any comments on this patch?
>> 
>> That's perfect. I've just applied it in my branch.
> 
> OK, in fact it is almost perfect :-)
> 
> The patch modified the documentation and not the driver itself, so I modified the subject to reflect that accurately.
> 
> Documentation: dt: gpio-omap: Move interrupt-controller from #interrupt-cell
>

Sorry about that, this pattern was not evident for me by looking the Git logs.
Now I know for future patches.

Thanks a lot for pointing this out!

> Regards,
> Benoit
> 
> 

Best regards,
Javier