[RFC][PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: clock: Add device tree support for AUXCLKs
Rajendra Nayak
rnayak at ti.com
Fri Mar 22 01:04:51 EST 2013
On Thursday 21 March 2013 07:24 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 03/21/2013 03:08 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> []..
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> index 0274ff7..23f2064 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>>> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(OMAP4_DT, "Generic OMAP4 (Flattened Device Tree)")
>>> .init_irq = omap_gic_of_init,
>>> .init_machine = omap_generic_init,
>>> .init_late = omap4430_init_late,
>>> - .init_time = omap4_local_timer_init,
>>> + .init_time = omap4_init_time,
>>> .dt_compat = omap4_boards_compat,
>>> .restart = omap44xx_restart,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>
>> []..
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> +int __init omap4_clk_init_dt(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_node *np;
>>> +
>>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,omap4-scrm");
>>> + if (np) {
>>> + scrm_data.clks = scrm_clks;
>>> + scrm_data.clk_num = ARRAY_SIZE(scrm_clks);
>>> + of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get, &scrm_data);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> []..
>>> +
>>> +void __init omap4_init_time(void)
>>> +{
>>> + omap4_clk_init_dt();
>>> + omap4_local_timer_init();
>>> +}
>>
>> I guess you did all this because of_clk_add_provider() needs
>> slab to be initialized. With the below patch[1], now clk inits
>> happen within .init_timer already, so none of this would
>> be needed.
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg231288.html
>>
>
> Right. I can then call omap4_clk_init_dt() from within omap4xxx_clk_init().
>
> Any comments about the main subject? Does the approach look fine?
It looks fine, except for the fact that I was wondering if the clock
provider needs to restrict itself to SCRM.
Nishant Menon brought up a need for specifying the mpu clock source
from within DT, to be able to use a generic cpufreq driver.
It could be a provider (not specific to scrm, but having only scrm
clocks for now) which we could add clocks as and when we see a need for
them to be specified from DT.
Btw, you need to copy Paul Walmsley for any clock related patches as
he is the OMAP clock maintainer.
>
> cheers,
> -roger
>
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list