[PATCH] ARM: dts: add interrupt-names property to get interrupt resource by name

[Rob Herring]

The subject is completely misleading. Make it clear what the scope of
this patch is.

On 03/13/2013 06:26 AM, Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> The FIMD driver expects the "vsync" interrupt to be mentioned as the 1st
> parameter in the FIMD DT node. So to meet this expectation of the driver,
> the FIMD DT node was forced to be made by keeping "vsync" as the 1st
> parameter.
> 
> this resolves the above mentioned "hack" by introducing
> "interrupt-names", so that FIMD driver can get the interrupt resource by
> name as discussed at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg16211.html

I fail to see what the hack is. The order of interrupt properties must
be defined by the binding. interrupt-names is auxiliary data and must
not be required by an OS.

> patch is dependent on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2184981/

Why the split? These should be combined.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan at linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> index 0ee4706..76c8911 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> @@ -588,6 +588,7 @@
>  		compatible = "samsung,exynos5-fimd";
>  		interrupt-parent = <&combiner>;
>  		reg = <0x14400000 0x40000>;
> -		interrupts = <18 5>, <18 4>, <18 6>;
> +		interrupt-names = "fifo", "vsync", "lcd_sys";
> +		interrupts = <18 4>, <18 5>, <18 6>;

There should be some documentation describing the order of the interrupts.

Rob