[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: provide compatibility string for DT matchup
Benoit Cousson
b-cousson at ti.com
Wed Mar 13 01:28:40 EST 2013
On 03/12/2013 06:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 March 2013 04:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> commit 5553f9e (cpufreq: instantiate cpufreq-cpu0 as a platform_driver)
>> now forces platform device to be registered for allowing cpufreq-cpu0
>> to be used by SoCs. example: drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c
>>
>> However, for SoCs that wish to link up using device tree, instead
>> of platform device, provide compatibility string match:
>> compatible = "cpufreq,cpu0";
You cannot add a non-HW relative binding... DT is supposed to represent
the pure HW.
AFAIK, cpufreq has nothing to do with the HW definition.
>>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw at sisk.pl>
>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org>
>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: cpufreq at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt | 3 +++
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
> Looks fine to me. CC'ing dt list in case some one has
> comments on binding updates.
>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
Not-Acked-by-me.
Regards,
Benoit
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list