[PATCH 01/13] usb: phy: nop: Add device tree support and binding information
Roger Quadros
rogerq at ti.com
Tue Mar 12 20:09:24 EST 2013
On 03/11/2013 05:52 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 08:26 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:58:48PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> The PHY clock, clock rate, VCC regulator and RESET regulator
>>> can now be provided via device tree.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/otg/nop-usb-xceiv.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..d7e2726
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>>> +USB NOP PHY
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: should be usb-nop-xceiv
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +- clocks: phandle to the PHY clock. Use as per Documentation/devicetree
>>> + /bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
>>> + This property is required if clock-frequency is specified.
>>> +
>>> +- clock-names: Should be "main_clk"
>>> +
>>> +- clock-frequency: the clock frequency (in Hz) that the PHY clock must
>>> + be configured to.
>>> +
>>> +- vcc-supply: phandle to the regulator that provides RESET to the PHY.
>>> +
>>> +- reset-supply: phandle to the regulator that provides power to the PHY.
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> + hsusb1_phy {
>>> + compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
>>> + clock-frequency = <19200000>;
>>> + clocks = <&osc 0>;
>>> + clock-names = "main_clk";
>>> + vcc-supply = <&hsusb1_vcc_regulator>;
>>> + reset-supply = <&hsusb1_reset_regulator>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> +hsusb1_phy is a NOP USB PHY device that gets its clock from an oscillator
>>> +and expects that clock to be configured to 19.2MHz by the NOP PHY driver.
>>> +hsusb1_vcc_regulator provides power to the PHY and hsusb1_reset_regulator
>>> +controls RESET.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/otg/nop-usb-xceiv.c b/drivers/usb/otg/nop-usb-xceiv.c
>>> index ac027a1..adbb7ab 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/otg/nop-usb-xceiv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/otg/nop-usb-xceiv.c
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>>
>>> struct nop_usb_xceiv {
>>> struct usb_phy phy;
>>> @@ -138,8 +139,19 @@ static int nop_set_host(struct usb_otg *otg, struct usb_bus *host)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void nop_xeiv_get_dt_pdata(struct device *dev,
>>
>> asking to remove, but xeiv != xceiv :-)
>>
>>> + struct nop_usb_xceiv_platform_data *pdata)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
>>> + u32 clk_rate;
>>> +
>>> + if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &clk_rate))
>>> + pdata->clk_rate = clk_rate;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int nop_usb_xceiv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> struct nop_usb_xceiv_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>>> struct nop_usb_xceiv *nop;
>>> enum usb_phy_type type = USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2;
>>> @@ -153,6 +165,17 @@ static int nop_usb_xceiv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (!nop->phy.otg)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> + if (dev->of_node) {
>>> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!pdata) {
>>> + dev_err(dev, "Memory allocation failure\n");
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> + }
>>> + nop_xeiv_get_dt_pdata(dev, pdata);
>>
>> actually, I would prefer to not create pdata at all. I mean, ideally
>> pdata would be used to initialize fields in your own structure, so first
>> move clk_rate to your own private structure, copy pdata's clk_rate value
>> to that, then you don't need this hackery when using DT.
>
> As far as I can see, clk_rate is never used, but in the probe function.
> Why should it be saved into the private data structure at all?
>
Yes you are right. I'll fix it up.
Thanks.
cheers,
-roger
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list