[PATCH RFC] usb: dwc3: Get PHY from platform specific dwc3 dt node.

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:41:29AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > >> >> >> Moreover, SoCs having multiple dwc3 controllers will have multiple
> > >> >> >> PHYs, which eventually be added using usb_add_phy_dev(), and not
> > >> >> >> using usb_add_phy(). So each dwc3 controller won't be able to
> > >> >> >> get PHYs by simply calling devm_usb_get_phy() also.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > No. We have added usb_get_phy_dev() for that purpose in the case of non-dt.
> > >> >> > I think, instead you can have a patch to use devm_usb_get_phy_dev() here and
> > >> >> > in exynos platform specific code use usb_bind_phy() to bind the phy and
> > >> >> > controller till you change it to dt.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> We have dt support for dwc3-exynos, in such case we should go ahead with
> > >> >> of_platform_populate(), right ?
> > >> >> But if when i use of_platform_populate() i will not be able to set
> > >> >> dma_mask to dwc3->dev. :-(
> > >> >
> > >> > do you have a special need for dma_mask because OF already sets it.
> > >> >
> > >> If i am not wrong of_platform_device_create_pdata() will set
> > >> "dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32)"
> > >> and not dma_mask.
> > >> I fact we had some discussion sometime back when we needed the same
> > >> for dwc3-exynos in the thread:
> > >> [PATCH v2 1/2] USB: dwc3-exynos: Add support for device tree
> > >>
> > >> But couldn't get final node on it.
> > >> So suggestions here please. :-)
> > >
> > > hmm.. you're right there. Grant, Rob ? Any hints ?
> > >
> > 
> > Any suggestions on this ?
> 
> anyone ?

ping ?

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20130304/bdb5bf50/attachment-0001.sig>