[PATCH] <linux/of_platform.h>: fix compilation warnings with DT disabled

[Rob Herring]

On 03/01/2013 07:55 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 01-03-2013 17:48, Rob Herring wrote:
> 
>>>>> Fix the following compilation warnings (in Simon Horman's
>>>>> renesas.git repo):
> 
>>>>> In file included from arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7779.c:24:0:
>>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: ‘struct of_device_id’
>>>>> declared
>>>>> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: its scope is only this
>>>>> definition
>>>>> or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by
>>>>> default]
>>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: ‘struct device_node’
>>>>> declared
>>>>> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> 
>>>>> <linux/of_platform.h> only #include's headers with definitions of
>>>>> the above
>>>>> mentioned structures if CONFIG_OF_DEVICE=y but uses them even if
>>>>> not. One
>>>>> solution is to move some #include's out of #ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE
>>>>> and use
>>>>> incomplete declarations for the rest of the structures where the
>>>>> #ifdef move
>>>>> doesn't help...
> 
>>>>> Reported-by: Vladimir Barinov <vladimir.barinov at cogentembedded.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com>
> 
>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas at verge.net.au>
> 
>>>> Grant, could you consider taking this patch?
> 
>>> Yes, I can, but I don't seem to have the original patch. Can you send it
>>> again.
> 
>> Nevermind. Found it. I'll apply it.
> 
>    Will you drop 'struct device_node' declaration then or should I
> resend? In fact, I think I should better resend it with the changelog
> somewhat edited.

No, I plan to leave it as is and not rely on device.h by chance
declaring device_node.

Rob

> 
>> Rob
> 
> WBR, Sergei
>