[PATCH 2/2] Input: Adding DT support for keyreset tuneables
Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 02:28:58 EST 2013
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:28:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:13:25AM -0600, mathieu.poirier at linaro.org wrote:
> > From: "Mathieu J. Poirier" <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
> >
> > This patch adds the possibility to get the keyreset and timeout
> > values from the device tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> > index b51c154..91d081c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
> > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> > #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> > #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
> > @@ -671,6 +672,50 @@ static void sysrq_detect_reset_sequence(struct sysrq_state *state,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void sysrq_of_get_keyreset_config(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned short key;
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > + const struct property *prop;
> > + const __be32 *val;
> > + int count, i;
> > +
> > + np = of_find_node_by_path("/sysrq");
> > + if (!np) {
> > + pr_info("No sysrq node found");
>
> I do not think this should be an info as majority would not have it
> defined I think.
>
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + prop = of_find_property(np, "linux,input-keyset", NULL);
>
> Maybe "linux,input-key*re*set"?
>
> > + if (!prop || !prop->value) {
> > + pr_err("Invalid input-keyset");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + count = prop->length / sizeof(u32);
> > + val = prop->value;
> > +
> > + if (count > SYSRQ_KEY_RESET_MAX)
> > + count = SYSRQ_KEY_RESET_MAX;
> > +
> > + /* reset in case a __weak definition was present */
> > + sysrq_reset_seq_len = 0;
>
> Hmm, my preference for ordering would be software over firmware, so that
> user could override firmware data, if needed.
>
> Please also add the documenation describing the binding.
Ah, I see the other patch now. I'd just combine the two.
--
Dmitry
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list