[PATCH v2 1/5] phy: Add driver for Exynos MIPI CSIS/DSIM DPHYs

[Kishon Vijay Abraham I]

On Wednesday 26 June 2013 05:52 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:03:42PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 06/26/2013 01:21 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>>>> +static int exynos_video_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>> +	struct exynos_video_phy *state;
>>>>>>>>>>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>>>>>>>>> +	struct resource *res;
>>>>>>>>>>> +	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
>>>>>>>>>>> +	int i;
>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>> +	state = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>>>>>>> +	if (!state)
>>>>>>>>>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>> +	state->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>>>>>>>>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(state->regs))
>>>>>>>>>>> +		return PTR_ERR(state->regs);
>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, state);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you can use platform_set_drvdata(pdev, state);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had it in the previous version, but changed for symmetry with
>>>>>>> dev_set_drvdata(). I guess those could be replaced with
>>>>>>> phy_{get, set}_drvdata as you suggested.
>>>
>>> right. currently I was setting dev_set_drvdata of phy (core) device
>>> in phy-core.c and the corresponding dev_get_drvdata in phy provider driver
>>> which is little confusing.
>>> So I'll add phy_set_drvdata and phy_get_drvdata in phy.h (as suggested by
>>> Felipe) to be used by phy provider drivers. So after creating the PHY, the
>>> phy provider should use phy_set_drvdata and in phy_ops, it can use
>>> phy_get_drvdata. (I'll remove the dev_set_drvdata in phy_create).
>>>
>>> This also means _void *priv_ in phy_create is useless. So I'll be removing
>>> _priv_ from phy_create.
>>
>> Yeah, sounds good. Then in the phy ops phy_get_drvdata(&phy->dev) would
>
> phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>
> accessing the dev pointer will be done inside the helper :-)

right :-)

-Kishon