[PATCH 8/9] iommu: add support for ARM Ltd. System MMU architecture

[Will Deacon]

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:30:44PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:00:06PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Damn, I was hoping to avoid locking on the map path. In fact, this is a good
> > argument to go with your suggestion below (otherwise I'd need to use
> > reader/writer locks which seem to be frowned on).
> 
> You should look into using rcu-lists instead. You still need a lock, but
> only when you actually manipulating the lists. For traversing them it is
> sufficient to take the rcu_read_lock() which has very low overhead.

Indeed, I'd got RCU-protected lists mixed up with the _safe iterators.
However, if I construct a compound output_mask as you suggest, all the
locking is on the slow path (add/attach of devices) so it's no longer an
issue.

I'll post a v2 next week.

Will