[PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: model SMPS10 as two regulators
Kishon Vijay Abraham I
kishon at ti.com
Sat Jun 22 00:00:26 EST 2013
On Friday 21 June 2013 06:55 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:56 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you added the regulator supply entries?
>>> Are you testing on mainline linux-next?
>> Not in linux-next :-( Tested only with mainline.
>> Does inverting the order helps?
>>
>
> I think because you do not have entry of supply in your dt node, it gets
> ignored by regulator_dev_lookup() and continue.
>
> I made the entry like (added entry form smps10-out2-supply and smps10-in-supply
> in dt node) and then it failed.
> /***
>
> + smps10-out2-supply = <&palmas_smps10_out2_reg>;
> + smps10-in-supply = <&tps65090_dcdc3_reg>;
> ldo3-in-supply = <&palmas_smps3_reg>;
> @@ -903,6 +905,20 @@
> regulator-always-on;
> };
>
> + palmas_smps10_out1_reg: smps10_out1 {
> + regulator-name = "smps10_out1";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + };
> +
> + palmas_smps10_out2_reg: smps10_out2 {
> + regulator-name = "smps10_out2";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + };
> +
> **/
>
>
> After reversing the sequence, it worked fine.
You mean, changing the order in dt node helped?
Thanks
Kishon
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list