[PATCH 2/3] mailbox/omap: add support for parsing dt devices
Cousson, Benoit
b-cousson at ti.com
Fri Jun 21 07:45:38 EST 2013
Hi Suman,
On 6/18/2013 5:34 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Logic has been added to the OMAP2+ mailbox code to
> parse the mailbox dt nodes and construct the different
> mailboxes associated with the instance. The design is
> based on gathering the same information that was being
> passed previously through the platform data, except for
> the interrupt type configuration information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt | 46 +++++++
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-omap2.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..913bc13
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +OMAP2+ Mailbox Driver
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: Should be one of the following,
> + "ti,omap2-mailbox" for
> + OMAP2420, OMAP2430, OMAP3430, OMAP3630 SoCs
> + "ti,omap4-mailbox" for
> + OMAP44xx, OMAP54xx, AM33xx, AM43xx, DRA7xx SoCs
> +- reg: Contains the mailbox register address range (base address
> + and length)
> +- interrupts: Contains the interrupt information for the mailbox
> + device. The format is dependent on which interrupt
> + controller the OMAP device uses
> +- ti,hwmods: Name of the hwmod associated with the mailbox
> +- ti,mbox-num-users: Number of targets (processor devices) that the mailbox device
> + can interrupt
> +- ti,mbox-num-fifos: Number of h/w fifos within the mailbox device
> +- #ti,mbox-data-cells: Cell size for describing a mailbox
> + (currently should be 4)
> +- ti,mbox-names: Array of the names of the mailboxes
> +- ti,mbox-data: Mailbox descriptor data private to each mailbox. The 4
> + cells represent the following data,
> + Cell #1 (tx_id) - mailbox fifo id used for
> + transmitting messages
> + Cell #2 (rx_id) - mailbox fifo id on which messages
> + are received
> + Cell #3 (irq_id) - irq identifier index number to use
> + from the interrupts data
> + Cell #4 (usr_id) - mailbox user id for identifying the
> + interrupt into the MPU interrupt
> + controller.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +/* OMAP4 */
> +mailbox: mailbox at 4a0f4000 {
> + compatible = "ti,omap4-mailbox";
> + reg = <0x4a0f4000 0x200>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 47 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + ti,hwmods = "mailbox";
> + ti,mbox-num-users = <3>;
> + ti,mbox-num-fifos = <8>;
> + #ti,mbox-data-cells = <4>
> + ti,mbox-names = "mbox-ipu", "mbox-dsp";
> + ti,mbox-data = <0 1 0 0>, <3 2 0 0>;
That seems to contain a bunch of low level IP internal information.
Cannot you figure out that from the MAILBOX_REVISION information?
mbox-names belong here because it does describe the connection outside
the IP, but I'm not sure all the other data should be there.
You should put in DT the minimal amount of data that are needed be the
driver to figure out the rest.
Please note that I did not check carefully every OMAP specs to see if
this is possible or not, but most of the time we can reduce the amount
of information thanks to some HW info already there.
Regards,
Benoit
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-omap2.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-omap2.c
> index 6c0687c..3fe08de 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-omap2.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-omap2.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> @@ -222,6 +223,21 @@ static struct omap_mbox_ops omap2_mbox_ops = {
> .restore_ctx = omap2_mbox_restore_ctx,
> };
>
> +static const struct of_device_id omap_mailbox_of_match[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "ti,omap2-mailbox",
> + .data = (void *) MBOX_INTR_CFG_TYPE1,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "ti,omap4-mailbox",
> + .data = (void *) MBOX_INTR_CFG_TYPE2,
> + },
> + {
> + /* end */
> + },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_mailbox_of_match);
> +
> static int omap2_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct resource *mem;
> @@ -229,47 +245,138 @@ static int omap2_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct omap_mbox **list, *mbox, *mboxblk;
> struct omap_mbox2_priv *priv, *privblk;
> struct omap_mbox_pdata *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> - struct omap_mbox_dev_info *info;
> struct omap_mbox_device *mdev;
> - int i;
> -
> - if (!pdata || !pdata->info_cnt || !pdata->info) {
> + struct omap_mbox_dev_info *info, *of_info = NULL;
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + int i, j;
> + u32 info_count = 0, intr_type = 0;
> + u32 num_users = 0, num_fifos = 0;
> + u32 dlen, dsize;
> + u32 *tmp;
> + const __be32 *mbox_data;
> +
> + if (!node && (!pdata || !pdata->info_cnt || !pdata->info)) {
> pr_err("%s: platform not supported\n", __func__);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> + if (node) {
> + intr_type = (u32)of_match_device(omap_mailbox_of_match,
> + &pdev->dev)->data;
> + if (intr_type != 0 && intr_type != 1) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid match data value\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,mbox-num-users",
> + &num_users)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "no ti,mbox-num-users configuration found\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,mbox-num-fifos",
> + &num_fifos)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "no ti,mbox-num-fifos configuration found\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "#ti,mbox-data-cells", &dsize)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "no #ti,mbox-data-cells configuration found\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + if (dsize != 4) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "invalid size for #ti,mbox-data-cells\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + info_count = of_property_count_strings(node, "ti,mbox-names");
> + if (!info_count) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no mbox devices found\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + mbox_data = of_get_property(node, "ti,mbox-data", &dlen);
> + if (!mbox_data) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no mbox device data found\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + dlen /= sizeof(dsize);
> + if (dlen != dsize * info_count) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "mbox device data is truncated\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + of_info = kzalloc(info_count * sizeof(*of_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!of_info)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + i = 0;
> + while (i < info_count) {
> + info = of_info + i;
> + if (of_property_read_string_index(node,
> + "ti,mbox-names", i, &info->name)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "mbox_name [%d] read failed\n", i);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto free_of;
> + }
> +
> + tmp = &info->tx_id;
> + for (j = 0; j < dsize; j++) {
> + tmp[j] = of_read_number(
> + mbox_data + j + (i * dsize), 1);
> + }
> + i++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!node) { /* non-DT device creation */
> + info_count = pdata->info_cnt;
> + info = pdata->info;
> + intr_type = pdata->intr_type;
> + num_users = pdata->num_users;
> + num_fifos = pdata->num_fifos;
> + } else {
> + info = of_info;
> + }
> +
> mdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*mdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!mdev)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!mdev) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_of;
> + }
>
> /* allocate one extra for marking end of list */
> - list = kzalloc((pdata->info_cnt + 1) * sizeof(*list), GFP_KERNEL);
> + list = kzalloc((info_count + 1) * sizeof(*list), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!list) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto free_mdev;
> }
>
> - mboxblk = mbox = kzalloc(pdata->info_cnt * sizeof(*mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> + mboxblk = mbox = kzalloc(info_count * sizeof(*mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mboxblk) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto free_list;
> }
>
> - privblk = priv = kzalloc(pdata->info_cnt * sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + privblk = priv = kzalloc(info_count * sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!privblk) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto free_mboxblk;
> }
>
> - info = pdata->info;
> - for (i = 0; i < pdata->info_cnt; i++, info++, priv++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < info_count; i++, info++, priv++) {
> priv->tx_fifo.msg = MAILBOX_MESSAGE(info->tx_id);
> priv->tx_fifo.fifo_stat = MAILBOX_FIFOSTATUS(info->tx_id);
> priv->rx_fifo.msg = MAILBOX_MESSAGE(info->rx_id);
> priv->rx_fifo.msg_stat = MAILBOX_MSGSTATUS(info->rx_id);
> priv->notfull_bit = MAILBOX_IRQ_NOTFULL(info->tx_id);
> priv->newmsg_bit = MAILBOX_IRQ_NEWMSG(info->rx_id);
> - if (pdata->intr_type) {
> + if (intr_type) {
> priv->irqenable = OMAP4_MAILBOX_IRQENABLE(info->usr_id);
> priv->irqstatus = OMAP4_MAILBOX_IRQSTATUS(info->usr_id);
> priv->irqdisable =
> @@ -279,7 +386,7 @@ static int omap2_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> priv->irqstatus = MAILBOX_IRQSTATUS(info->usr_id);
> priv->irqdisable = MAILBOX_IRQENABLE(info->usr_id);
> }
> - priv->intr_type = pdata->intr_type;
> + priv->intr_type = intr_type;
>
> mbox->priv = priv;
> mbox->parent = mdev;
> @@ -307,8 +414,8 @@ static int omap2_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> mutex_init(&mdev->cfg_lock);
> mdev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> - mdev->num_users = pdata->num_users;
> - mdev->num_fifos = pdata->num_fifos;
> + mdev->num_users = num_users;
> + mdev->num_fifos = num_fifos;
> mdev->mboxes = list;
> ret = omap_mbox_register(&pdev->dev, list);
> if (ret)
> @@ -317,6 +424,7 @@ static int omap2_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pm_runtime_enable(mdev->dev);
>
> + kfree(of_info);
> return 0;
>
> unmap_mbox:
> @@ -329,6 +437,8 @@ free_list:
> kfree(list);
> free_mdev:
> kfree(mdev);
> +free_of:
> + kfree(of_info);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -358,6 +468,7 @@ static struct platform_driver omap2_mbox_driver = {
> .remove = omap2_mbox_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "omap-mailbox",
> + .of_match_table = omap_mailbox_of_match,
> },
> };
>
>
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list