[RFC PATCH v4 2/2] drivers: mfd: vexpress: add Serial Power Controller (SPC) support
Lorenzo Pieralisi
lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com
Tue Jun 18 20:26:14 EST 2013
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:25:22AM +0100, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>
> > The TC2 versatile express core tile integrates a logic block that provides the
> > interface between the dual cluster test-chip and the M3 microcontroller that
> > carries out power management. The logic block, called Serial Power Controller
> > (SPC), contains several memory mapped registers to control among other things
> > low-power states, operating points and reset control.
>
> [...]
>
> I slightly modified the following before committing this patch to my TC2
> branch:
>
> > +/**
> > + * ve_spc_cpu_wakeup_irq()
> > + *
> > + * Function to set/clear per-CPU wake-up IRQs. Not protected by locking since
> > + * it might be used in code paths where normal cacheable locks are not
> > + * working. Locking must be provided by the caller to ensure atomicity.
> > + *
> > + * @cpu: mpidr[7:0] bitfield describing cpu affinity level
> > + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> > + * @set: if true, wake-up IRQs are set, if false they are cleared
> > + */
> > +void ve_spc_cpu_wakeup_irq(u32 cpu, u32 cluster, bool set)
> > +{
>
> I made cluster first then cpu. All the other functions have the cluster
> argument first, and ve_spc_set_resume_addr() already uses that order.
Ok thanks.
> [...]
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_VEXPRESS_SPC
> > +int ve_spc_probe(void);
> > +int ve_spc_get_freq(u32 cluster);
> > +int ve_spc_set_freq(u32 cluster, u32 freq);
> > +int ve_spc_get_freq_table(u32 cluster, const u32 **fptr);
> > +void ve_spc_global_wakeup_irq(bool set);
> > +void ve_spc_cpu_wakeup_irq(u32 cpu, u32 cluster, bool set);
> > +void ve_spc_set_resume_addr(u32 cluster, u32 cpu, u32 addr);
> > +u32 ve_spc_get_nr_cpus(u32 cluster);
> > +void ve_spc_powerdown(u32 cluster, bool enable);
> > +#else
> > +static inline bool ve_spc_probe(void) { return -ENODEV; }
>
> s/bool/int/
Bah, sorry.
Thanks a lot,
Lorenzo
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list