[PATCH v2 02/10] mmc: omap_hsmmc: make vcc and vcc_aux independent

[Tony Lindgren]

* Balaji T K <balajitk at ti.com> [130612 07:39]:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 07:55 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Balaji T K <balajitk at ti.com> [130606 12:20]:
> >>handle vcc and vcc_aux independently
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk at ti.com>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c |    9 +++++----
> >>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> >>index 1865321..bda1a42 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> >>@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_set_power(struct device *dev, int slot, int power_on,
> >>  	 * If we don't see a Vcc regulator, assume it's a fixed
> >>  	 * voltage always-on regulator.
> >>  	 */
> >>-	if (!host->vcc)
> >>+	if (!host->vcc && !host->vcc_aux)
> >>  		return 0;
> >>  	/*
> >>  	 * With DT, never turn OFF the regulator for MMC1. This is because
> >
> >Doesn't the above change break MMC for most boards that only pass
> >one regulator and no aux regulator?
> >
> 
> No, I want to skip regulator operation in set_power function iff both
> regulator are not present.
> 
> Earlier vcc was assumed/mandatory if vcc_aux is present.
> Now, regulator operation will be handled if either one of vcc/vcc_aux is present,

Ah OK yes sorry I misread your patch.

Regards,

Tony