[RFC/PATCH v2 0/2] R-Car GPIO DT bindings

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:14:49AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Saturday 25 May 2013 10:24:34 Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Here's the second version of the gpio-rcar driver DT bindings. I've tested
> > > the patches on the Marzen board (r8a7779).
> > > 
> > > Once again I'd appreciate feedback on the DT bindings. I'm particularly
> > > wondering whether getting the number of lines through the gpio-ranges
> > > property instead of using a dedicated #gpio-lines property as in v1 is a
> > > good idea.
> > > 
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > 
> > > - Initialize the gpiochip dev field at probe time.
> > > - Add the gpio-ranges property.
> > > - Remove the #gpio-lines property. The number of lines is now passed
> > > through> 
> > >   the gpio-ranges property.
> > > 
> > > Laurent Pinchart (2):
> > >   gpio-rcar: Make the platform data gpio_base field signed
> > >   gpio-rcar: Add DT support
> > >  
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt | 52 +++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c                           | 66 +++++++++++++----
> > >  include/linux/platform_data/gpio-rcar.h            |  2 +-
> > >  3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
> >
> > Hi Magnus,
> > 
> > could you please review these changes?
> 
> I've received Magnus' ack face-to-face last week. I'm not sure whether that's 
> a proper procedure, but I'm sure he will confirm that if needed.

Its sufficient for my needs.

> Could you please take the patch in your tree for v3.11 ?

Sure, I'll see what I can do.