[PATCH 1/4] pwm_backlight: Fix PWM levels support in non DT case

[Thierry Reding]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:39:53PM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> It is expected that board files would have:
> static unsigned int bl_levels[] = { 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, };
> 
> static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data bl_data = {
> 	.levels = bl_levels,
> 	.max_brightness = ARRAY_SIZE(bl_levels),
> 	.dft_brightness = 4,
> 	.pwm_period_ns = 7812500,
> };
> 
> In this case the max_brightness would be out of range in the levels array.
> Decrement the received max_brightness in every case (DT or non DT) when the
> levels has been provided.

What's wrong with specifying .max_brightness = ARRAY_SIZE(bl_levels) - 1
instead?

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20130128/bcb5ecd1/attachment.sig>