[PATCH v2 2/4] input: keyboard: tegra: use devm_* for resource allocation

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:49:59PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 10:23:52AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:19:39AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:07:45AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:57:48AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 08:27:39PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 12:06:58AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 01:15:08PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > > @@ -735,25 +738,16 @@ static int tegra_kbc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > > >  	spin_lock_init(&kbc->lock);
> > > > > > > >  	setup_timer(&kbc->timer, tegra_kbc_keypress_timer, (unsigned long)kbc);
> > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > -	res = request_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res), pdev->name);
> > > > > > > > -	if (!res) {
> > > > > > > > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request I/O memory\n");
> > > > > > > > -		err = -EBUSY;
> > > > > > > > -		goto err_free_mem;
> > > > > > > > -	}
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > -	kbc->mmio = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> > > > > > > > +	kbc->mmio = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
> > > > > > > >  	if (!kbc->mmio) {
> > > > > > > > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to remap I/O memory\n");
> > > > > > > > -		err = -ENXIO;
> > > > > > > > -		goto err_free_mem_region;
> > > > > > > > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot request memregion/iomap address\n");
> > > > > > > > +		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Erm, no, -EBUSY please.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > EADDRNOTAVAIL is the canonical error for devm_request_and_ioremap()
> > > > > > failure. The kerneldoc comment in lib/devres.c even gives a short
> > > > > > example that uses this error code.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am sorry, but I do not consider a function that was added a little
> > > > > over a year ago as a canon. If you look at the uses of EADDRNOTAVAIL it
> > > > > is used predominantly in networking code to indicate that attempted
> > > > > _network_ address is not available.
> > > > 
> > > > EBUSY might be misleading, though. devm_request_and_ioremap() can fail
> > > > in both the request_mem_region() and ioremap() calls. Furthermore it'd
> > > > be good to settle on a consistent error-code instead of doing it
> > > > differently depending on subsystem and/or driver. Currently the various
> > > > error codes used are:
> > > > 
> > > > 	EBUSY, EADDRNOTAVAIL, ENXIO, ENOMEM, ENODEV, ENOENT, EINVAL,
> > > > 	EIO, EFAULT, EADDRINUSE
> > > > 
> > > > Also if we can settle on one error code we should follow up with a patch
> > > > to make it consistent across the tree and also update that kerneldoc
> > > > comment. I volunteer to do that if nobody else steps up. I'm also Cc'ing
> > > > Wolfram (the original author), maybe he has some thoughts on this.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > If you going to change all drivers make devm_request_and_ioremap()
> > > return ERR_PTR()-encoded errors and then we can differentiate what
> > > part of it failed.
> > 
> > Yeah, that thought also crossed my mind. I'll give other people some
> > time to comment before hurling myself into preparing patches.
> 
> I've prepared a patch that changes devm_request_and_ioremap() to return
> ERR_PTR()-encoded errors and adjusts all callers. As you can imagine it
> is a bit on the huge side. scripts/get_maintainer.pl lists 156 people
> and mailing lists. I've gone through the list, and as far as I can tell
> everyone on that list is actually affected by the patch, so there's not
> much potential for tuning it down.
> 
> There is also the issue of whose tree this should go into. Unfortunately
> the patch can't be broken down into smaller chunks because it changes
> how the devm_request_and_ioremap() function's return value is handled in
> an incompatible way, so it won't be possible to gradually phase this in.
> Furthermore I can imagine that until the end of the release cycle new
> code may be added on which the same transformations need to be done. I
> have a semantic patch to do the bulk of the work, but quite a bit of
> coordination will be required.
> 
> I'm adding Arnd and Greg on Cc, maybe they can advise on how best to
> handle this kind of patch.

You should provide a "wrapper" function that does the correct return
value, convert drivers over to it, and then, when everyone is changed,
drop the old call.  To change 156 different drivers all at once, in a
way that is not detectable by the compiler breaking the build, is not a
good thing to do at all.

By doing it in this manner, it will take longer, but you can push the
patches through the different maintainer's trees.  If they are slow,
I'll be glad to take the remaining patches in my driver-core tree to do
the final bits.

Hope this helps,

greg k-h