[PATCH] ARM: kernel: DT cpu map validity check helper function

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:15:14PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:48:27AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > Since the introduction of /cpu nodes bindings for ARM and the
> > > corresponding parse function arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(), the cpu_logical_map
> > > and the number of possible CPUs are set according to the DT /cpu
> > > nodes entries. Currently most of the existing ARM SMP platforms detect the
> > > number of cores through HW probing in their .smp_init_cpus functions and set
> > > the possible CPU mask accordingly.
> > > This method should be upgraded so that the CPU counting mechanism will be
> > > based on DT, keeping legacy HW probing mechanism as a fall back solution.
> > > 
> > > In order to implement this fall back solution mechanism, the ARM DT code
> > > should provide a helper function to platforms to check if the cpu map
> > > has been properly initialized through DT. If the check fails the
> > > platform will resort to legacy HW based cores counting mechanism.
> > > 
> > > This patch implements a trivial flag and a helper function that platform
> > > can call to check whether DT based cpu map initialization and cores count
> > > were completed successfully.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/prom.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > >  arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c   |  5 +++++
> > >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/prom.h
> > > index a219227..487614a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/prom.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/prom.h
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,15 @@
> > >  extern struct machine_desc *setup_machine_fdt(unsigned int dt_phys);
> > >  extern void arm_dt_memblock_reserve(void);
> > >  extern void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void);
> > > +/*
> > > + * Return true if cpu map initialization has been
> > > + * carried out correctly from DT
> > > + */
> > > +static inline bool __init arm_dt_cpu_map_valid(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	extern bool valid_dt_cpu_map;
> > > +	return valid_dt_cpu_map;
> > > +}
> > >  
> > >  #else /* CONFIG_OF */
> > >  
> > > @@ -28,6 +37,7 @@ static inline struct machine_desc *setup_machine_fdt(unsigned int dt_phys)
> > >  
> > >  static inline void arm_dt_memblock_reserve(void) { }
> > >  static inline void arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void) { }
> > > +static inline bool __init arm_dt_cpu_map_valid(void) { return false; }
> > >  
> > >  #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> > >  #endif /* ASMARM_PROM_H */
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
> > > index 70f1bde..c82af3b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
> > > @@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ void __init arm_dt_memblock_reserve(void)
> > >  		memblock_reserve(base, size);
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > > +/*
> > > + * Export DT cpu map validity flag to platforms
> > > + */
> > > +bool valid_dt_cpu_map __initdata;
> > 
> > Is there any possibility of this being useful after boot?
> > Hopefully not, but maybe there's something I haven't considered.
> 
> I do not think so, at least for the use cases I have envisaged at the moment,
> but it is certainly something I should consider.

Let's simply adjust the code in the future if that ever becomes the 
case.


Nicolas