[PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: fix compatible value for exynos pinctrl

[Kukjin Kim]

Olof Johansson wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>
> wrote:
> > Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4 SoCs.
> 
> Ah, this answers my question from the previous patch. So, why do 5450
> as a separate patch?
> 
OK, let me create one patch to fix it :-)

> 
> > diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
> > index e97a278..4598a47 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
> > @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ on-chip controllers onto these pads.
> >
> >  Required Properties:
> >  - compatible: should be one of the following.
> > -  - "samsung,pinctrl-exynos4210": for Exynos4210 compatible pin-
> controller.
> > -  - "samsung,pinctrl-exynos4x12": for Exynos4x12 compatible pin-
> controller.
> > -  - "samsung,pinctrl-exynos5250": for Exynos5250 compatible pin-
> controller.
> > +  - "samsung,exynos4210-pinctrl": for Exynos4210 compatible pin-
> controller.
> > +  - "samsung,exynos4x12-pinctrl": for Exynos4x12 compatible pin-
> controller.
> > +  - "samsung,exynos5250-pinctrl": for Exynos5250 compatible pin-
> controller.
> 
> Do we care about backwards compatibility for ARM device trees yet?
> It's becoming time to start caring soon, if we don't. So while this
> might be OK for this time around, we should start requiring some
> backwards compatibility for bindings that have been used in at least
> one released kernel.
> 
Agree, let me check again.

> Once we do care, then you can update the dts/dtsi files, but you'll
> need to keep both the old and the new bindings in the C file below.
> 
OK, I see.

Thanks.

[...]

- Kukjin