[PATCHv16 5/7] fbmon: add of_videomode helpers

[Steffen Trumtrar]

Hi Afzal,

On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:10:13AM +0000, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 22:34:14, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > Add helper to get fb_videomode from devicetree.
> 
> >  drivers/video/fbmon.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/fb.h    |    4 ++++
> 
> This breaks DaVinci (da8xx_omapl_defconfig), following change was
> required to get it build if OF_VIDEOMODE or/and FB_MODE_HELPERS
> is not defined. There may be better solutions, following was the
> one that was used by me to test this series.
> 
> ---8<----------
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fb.h b/include/linux/fb.h
> index 58b9860..0ce30d1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fb.h
> @@ -716,9 +716,19 @@ extern void fb_destroy_modedb(struct fb_videomode *modedb);
>  extern int fb_find_mode_cvt(struct fb_videomode *mode, int margins, int rb);
>  extern unsigned char *fb_ddc_read(struct i2c_adapter *adapter);
> 
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF_VIDEOMODE) && defined(CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS)
>  extern int of_get_fb_videomode(struct device_node *np,
>                                struct fb_videomode *fb,
>                                int index);
> +#else
> +static inline int of_get_fb_videomode(struct device_node *np,
> +                                     struct fb_videomode *fb,
> +                                     int index)
> +{
> +       return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  extern int fb_videomode_from_videomode(const struct videomode *vm,
>                                        struct fb_videomode *fbmode);
> 
> ---8<----------
> 

I just did a quick "make da8xx_omapl_defconfig && make" and it builds just fine.
On what version did you apply the series?
At the moment I have the series sitting on 3.7. Didn't try any 3.8-rcx yet.
But fixing this shouldn't be a problem.

> 
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_VIDEOMODE)
> 
> As _OF_VIDEOMODE is a bool type CONFIG, isn't,
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF_VIDEOMODE
> 
> sufficient ?
> 

Yes, that is right. But I think IS_ENABLED is the preferred way to do it, isn't it?

Regards,
Steffen

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |