[PATCH v5 5/5] ARM: exynos: dts: Add FIMD DT binding Documentation

[Sachin Kamat]

Hi Vikas,

On 27 February 2013 14:13, Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan at linaro.org> wrote:
> Adds FIMD DT binding documentation both SoC and Board, with an example
>
> Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan at linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/video/exynos-fimd.txt      |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/exynos-fimd.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/exynos-fimd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/exynos-fimd.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b3542b9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/exynos-fimd.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +Device-Tree bindings for Exynos SoC display controller (FIMD)
> +
> +FIMD stands for Fully Interactive Mobile Display, is the Display Controller for
> +the Exynos series of SoCs which transfers the image data from a video buffer

I think this should be Samsung series of SoCs intead of Exynos series.
As such the file name could be samsung-fimd.txt.

> +located in the system memory to an external LCD interface.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible := value can be one these below

"value should be one of the following:"


> +               "samsung,s3c2443-fimd"; /* for S3C24XX SoCs */
> +               "samsung,s3c6400-fimd"; /* for S3C64XX SoCs */
> +               "samsung,s5p6440-fimd"; /* for S5P64X0 SoCs */
> +               "samsung,s5pc100-fimd"; /* for S5PC100 SoC  */
> +               "samsung,s5pv210-fimd"; /* for S5PV210 SoC */
> +               "samsung,exynos4210-fimd"; /* for Exynos4 SoCs */
> +               "samsung,exynos5250-fimd"; /* for Exynos5 SoCs */

blank line here would make it more readable?

> +- reg := physical base address of the fimd and length of memory mapped region
> +- interrupt-parent := reference to the interrupt combiner node with phandle
> +- interrupts := interrupt number from the combiner to the cpu
> +               we have 3 interrupts and the Interrupt combiner order is
> +               FIFO Level, VSYNC and LCD_SYSTEM. Make sure to mention order
> +               as VSYNC, FIFO Level and LCD_SYSTEM as show in the example below.

Please rephrase the above as there seems to be difference in order in
the above 2 lines itself. :)


-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin