[PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons

[Manish Badarkhe]

Hi Tushar

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera at linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>>> and added on top of the below patch:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>>>      spi_2: spi at 12d40000 {
>>>              status = "disabled";
>>>      };
>>> +
>>> +    gpio_keys {
>>> +            compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +            #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>> anyone is using here.
>>
>
> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.

I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing

which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
of address-cells and size-cells propeties.

Correct me if I am wrong here?

Thanks
Manish Badarkhe