[PATCH v2] gpio: mcp23s08: convert driver to DT
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Tue Feb 12 08:25:51 EST 2013
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:52:42 +0100, Lars Poeschel <larsi at wh2.tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> From: Lars Poeschel <poeschel at lemonage.de>
>
> This converts the mcp23s08 driver to be able to be used with device
> tree.
> Explicitly allow -1 as a legal value for the
> mcp23s08_platform_data->base. This is the special value lets the
> kernel choose a valid global gpio base number.
> There is a "mcp,chips" device tree property, that correspond to the
> chips member of the struct mcp23s08_platform_data. It can be used for
> multiple mcp23s08/mc23s17 on the same spi chipselect.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <poeschel at lemonage.de>
> ---
> v2:
> - squashed booth patches together
> - fixed build warning, when CONFIG_OF is not defined
> - use of_match_ptr macro for of_match_table
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt | 36 ++++++++
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..17eb669
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +Microchip MCP2308/MCP23S08/MCP23017/MCP23S17 driver for
> +8-/16-bit I/O expander with serial interface (I2C/SPI)
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : Should be
> + - "mcp,mcp23s08" for 8 GPIO SPI version
> + - "mcp,mcp23s17" for 16 GPIO SPI version
> + - "mcp,mcp23008" for 8 GPIO I2C version or
> + - "mcp,mcp23017" for 16 GPIO I2C version of the chip
> +- #gpio-cells : Should be two.
> + - first cell is the pin number
> + - second cell is used to specify optional parameters (currently unused)
> +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a GPIO controller.
> +- reg : For an address on its bus
> +
> +Optional device specific properties:
> +- mcp,chips : This is a table with 2 columns and up to 8 entries. The first column
> + is a is_present flag, that makes only sense for SPI chips. Multiple
> + chips can share the same chipselect. This flag can be 0 or 1 depending
> + if there is a chip at this address or not.
> + The second column is written to the GPPU register, selecting a 100k
> + pullup resistor or not. Setting a 1 is activating the pullup.
> + For I2C chips only the first line in this table is used. Further chips
> + are registered at different addresses at the I2C bus.
Since these are two separate things, I would put them into separate
properties. Perhaps something like:
- mcp,spi-present-mask = < mask >; /* one bit per chip */
- mcp,pullup-enable-mask = < enable-value ... >;
However, is the pullup selection per-gpio line? If so, then why not
encode it into the flags field of the gpio specifier?
> +
> +Example:
> +gpiom1: gpio at 20 {
> + compatible = "mcp,mcp23017";
> + gpio-controller;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> + reg = <0x20>;
> + chips = <
> + /* is_present pullups */
> + 1 0x07 /* chip address 0 */
> + >;
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
> index 3cea0ea..ad08a5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> #include <linux/spi/mcp23s08.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <asm/byteorder.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>
> /**
> * MCP types supported by driver
> @@ -473,17 +475,88 @@ fail:
>
> /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static struct of_device_id mcp23s08_of_match[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_MASTER
> + {
> + .compatible = "mcp,mcp23s08",
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "mcp,mcp23s17",
> + },
> +#endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
> + {
> + .compatible = "mcp,mcp23008",
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "mcp,mcp23017",
> + },
> +#endif
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mcp23s08_of_match);
I don't think this is actually what you want. You should use separate
match tables; one for I2C and one for SPI.
> +
> +static struct mcp23s08_platform_data *
> + of_get_mcp23s08_pdata(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct mcp23s08_platform_data *pdata;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + u32 chips[sizeof(pdata->chip)];
> + int ret, i, j;
> +
> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + pdata->base = -1;
> +
> + for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->chip) * MCP23S08_CHIP_INFO_MEMBERS;
> + i > 0; i -= MCP23S08_CHIP_INFO_MEMBERS) {
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "mcp,chips", chips, i);
> + if (ret == -EOVERFLOW)
> + continue;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (!ret) {
> + for (j = 0; j < i / MCP23S08_CHIP_INFO_MEMBERS ; j++) {
> + pdata->chip[j].is_present =
> + chips[j * MCP23S08_CHIP_INFO_MEMBERS];
> + pdata->chip[j].pullups =
> + chips[j * MCP23S08_CHIP_INFO_MEMBERS + 1];
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return pdata;
Using devm is probably overkill since the pdata structure is not touched
again after probe() exits. You could instead just put the
mcp23s08_platform_data structure into the stack of the probe hook.
> +}
> +#else
> +static struct mcp23s08_platform_data *
> + of_get_mcp23s08_pdata(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> +
> +
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
>
> static int mcp230xx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> - struct mcp23s08_platform_data *pdata;
> + struct mcp23s08_platform_data *pdata = NULL;
> struct mcp23s08 *mcp;
> int status;
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>
> - pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
> - if (!pdata || !gpio_is_valid(pdata->base)) {
> + match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(mcp23s08_of_match), &client->dev);
> + if (match)
> + pdata = of_get_mcp23s08_pdata(&client->dev);
> +
> + /* if there was no pdata in DT, take it the legacy way */
> + if (!pdata)
> + pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
> +
> + if ((!pdata || !gpio_is_valid(pdata->base)) && pdata->base != -1) {
> dev_dbg(&client->dev, "invalid or missing platform data\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -531,6 +604,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver mcp230xx_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "mcp230xx",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mcp23s08_of_match),
> },
> .probe = mcp230xx_probe,
> .remove = mcp230xx_remove,
> @@ -560,17 +634,25 @@ static void mcp23s08_i2c_exit(void) { }
>
> static int mcp23s08_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> - struct mcp23s08_platform_data *pdata;
> + struct mcp23s08_platform_data *pdata = NULL;
> unsigned addr;
> unsigned chips = 0;
> struct mcp23s08_driver_data *data;
> int status, type;
> unsigned base;
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>
> type = spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data;
>
> - pdata = spi->dev.platform_data;
> - if (!pdata || !gpio_is_valid(pdata->base)) {
> + match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(mcp23s08_of_match), &spi->dev);
> + if (match)
> + pdata = of_get_mcp23s08_pdata(&spi->dev);
> +
> + /* if there was no pdata in DT, take it the legacy way */
> + if (!pdata)
> + pdata = spi->dev.platform_data;
> +
> + if ((!pdata || !gpio_is_valid(pdata->base)) && pdata->base != -1) {
> dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid or missing platform data\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -668,6 +750,7 @@ static struct spi_driver mcp23s08_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "mcp23s08",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mcp23s08_of_match),
> },
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h b/include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h
> index 2d676d5..3969e12 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +#define MCP23S08_CHIP_INFO_MEMBERS 2
>
> /* FIXME driver should be able to handle IRQs... */
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list