[PATCH] mfd: stmpe: Pull IRQ GPIO number from DT during DT-based probe

[Grant Likely]

On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:42:53 +0100, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 8 January 2013 16:41, Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>> Hmm.. I tried a bit, but couldn't find any such call :(
> >>> Probably an assumption is taken here. GPIO pins which are going to be used as
> >>> interrupt lines, wouldn't be getting set in output mode at all. So,
> >>> once they are put
> >>> in input mode in beginning, nobody would change it ever.
> >>>
> >>> Much of gpio controllers configure gpio pins in input mode in their probe().
> >>>
> >>> Maybe, there is something else :)
> >>
> >> Pinctrl?
> >
> > I don't think pinctrl is playing with it. I searched for
> > "direction_input" string and
> > pinctrl routine also had similar name. I couldn't fine use of
> > direction_input anywhere
> > in kernel, for setting them as irqs for OF cases.
> 
> pinctrl has pinctrl_gpio_direction_input() and
> pinctrl_gpio_direction_output() which are supposed to
> be called *only* by GPIOlib frontends using pinctrl
> as backend to control the pins.
> 
> But if it's a pinctrl driver using standard pinconfig from
> include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h
> I'm all for adding a PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE
> to these definintions so it can be set up as input
> at boot from the device tree using hogs or something,
> that make things easy when using GPIOs as IRQ
> providers only.
> 
> So the alternative is to just set up the IRQ using the
> gpiolib functions for this: of_get_gpio() if you need the
> number from DT, then gpio_request() and
> gpio_direction_input() as on any GPIO. This can be
> done in the device driver or board code depending
> on use case.
> 
> In the Nomadik I did this (maybe ugly) hack for a
> similar case:
> 
> +/*
> + * The SMSC911x IRQ is connected to a GPIO pin, but the driver expects
> + * to simply request an IRQ passed as a resource. So the GPIO pin needs
> + * to be requested by this hog and set as input.
> + */
> +static int __init cpu8815_eth_init(void)
> +{
> +       struct device_node *eth;
> +       int gpio, irq, err;
> +
> +       eth = of_find_node_by_path("/external-bus at 34000000/ethernet at 300");
> +       if (!eth) {
> +               pr_info("could not find any ethernet controller\n");
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +       gpio = of_get_gpio(eth, 0);
> +       err = gpio_request(gpio, "eth_irq");
> +       if (err) {
> +               pr_info("failed to request ethernet GPIO\n");
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +       }
> +       err = gpio_direction_input(gpio);
> +       if (err) {
> +               pr_info("failed to set ehernet GPIO as input\n");
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +       }
> +       irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
> +       pr_info("enabled ethernet GPIO %d, IRQ %d\n", gpio, irq);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +device_initcall(cpu8815_eth_init);
> 
> I haven't read review comments on that patch.
> 
> Maybe it's not such a good idea to add the GPIO to the device itself
> when it's being hogged by board code like this. It's a bit of a grey area
> so I'm a bit confused here.
> 
> Maybe the GPIO lib actually needs a "hog" mechanism that can
> request and set GPIO pins as input/output on boot and then
> forget about them.

That would be reasonable. Probably as properties in the gpio controller
node that specify how to set the inital state.

g.