[PATCH/RFC] mmc: add DT bindings for more MMC capability flags
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Thu Feb 7 09:00:35 EST 2013
On Wednesday 06 February 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 06 February 2013 17:25:42 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank for pointing me out at that thread. However, I don't think
> > > MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_CARD has anything to do with compatibility or hardware
> > > revisions. At least I haven't yet come across any sd/mmc hosts, that also
> > > supply card power. You could "derive" this flag from the presence of a
> > > regulator, capable of changing its status (switching on / off), but even
> > > then you're not guaranteed, that you actually can (and want to) power the
> > > card off at run-time - the regulator can be shared etc. So, an explicit
> > > flag is needed.
> >
> > It sounds like something that should be handled in a controller specific
> > way I think. E.g. on SDHCI, there seems to always be a method to power
> > down the card using the SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL register, even without
> > any external regulators.
>
> If I understand correctly, that register only controls card bus power.
> Further sdhci.c uses regulators (host->vmmc) to power up and down the
> card.
Ok, that may be true. So a device that can only power down the bus
but not the card itself should not set MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_CARD
then? I only saw that it is set unconditionally for the PCI
case, which does not use regulators.
Arnd
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list