[PATCH 09/13] mfd: omap-usb-host: Add device tree support and binding information
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Wed Feb 6 01:20:49 EST 2013
Hi,
I have a few comments on the binding and the way it's parsed.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:58:56PM +0000, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Allows the OMAP HS USB host controller to be specified
> via device tree.
>
> CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/omap-usb-host.txt | 68 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/omap-usb-host.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/omap-usb-host.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/omap-usb-host.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2196893
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/omap-usb-host.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +OMAP HS USB Host
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible: should be "ti,usbhs-host"
> +- reg: should contain one register range i.e. start and length
> +- ti,hwmods: must contain "usb_host_hs"
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +
> +- nports: number of USB ports. Usually this is automatically detected
> + from the IP's revision register but can be overridden by specifying
> + this property.
It would be nice if this were "num-ports", as atmel-usb is already using that,
and it's clear that it's a number of ports rather than some other meaning of
'n'.
>From a quick grep of binding documents, out of "nTHING(s)", "nr-THINGs", and
num-THINGs, num-THINGs seems to be the most common. It would be nice if new
bindings could standardise this.
> +
> +- portN_mode: Integer specifying the port mode for port N, where N can be
> + from 1 to nports. The port mode must be as per enum usbhs_omap_port_mode
> + in include/linux/platform_data/usb-omap.h
> + If the port mode is not specified, that port is treated as unused.
I'm against devicetree bindings refering to Linux internals. It makes a poorly
documented ABI that someone might change in future without realising the
implications, and it makes it stupidly difficult to read a dts.
Everything required should be specified in the binding document (or another
linked binding document). It might be better to describe this with a string
property that gets mapped by your dt parsing code to whatever internal
representation you need. That way it's far easier for a human to verify the dts
is correct, and you know by construction that the parsed value is something you
can handle in the driver.
It would be nicer is you used '-' rather than '_' for consistency with
devicetree bindings in general.
> +
> +- single_ulpi_bypass: Must be present if the controller contains a single
> + ULPI bypass control bit. e.g. OMAP3 silicon <= ES2.1
Again it would be nicer to have '-' rather than '_' here. It might be worth
prefixing this "ti,".
> +
> +Required properties if child node exists:
> +
> +- #address-cells: Must be 1
> +- #size-cells: Must be 1
> +- ranges: must be present
> +
> +Properties for children:
> +
> +The OMAP HS USB Host subsystem contains EHCI and OHCI controllers.
> +See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-ehci.txt and
> +omap3-ohci.txt
> +
> +Example for OMAP4:
> +
> +usbhshost: usbhshost at 0x4a064000 {
> + compatible = "ti,usbhs-host";
> + reg = <0x4a064000 0x800>;
> + ti,hwmods = "usb_host_hs";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + usbhsohci: ohci at 0x4a064800 {
> + compatible = "ti,omap3-ohci", "usb-ohci";
> + reg = <0x4a064800 0x400>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + interrupts = <0 76 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + usbhsehci: ehci at 0x4a064c00 {
> + compatible = "ti,omap-ehci", "usb-ehci";
> + reg = <0x4a064c00 0x400>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + interrupts = <0 77 0x4>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&usbhshost {
> + port1_mode = <1>; /* OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_PHY */
> + port2_mode = <2>; /* OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_TLL */
> + port3_mode = <1>; /* OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_PHY */
With a string property, these values would be self-documenting.
> +};
> +
> +&usbhsehci {
> + phy = <&hsusb1_phy 0 &hsusb3_phy>;
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> index f8ed08e..0f67856 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
> /**
> * omap-usb-host.c - The USBHS core driver for OMAP EHCI & OHCI
> *
> - * Copyright (C) 2011 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com
> + * Copyright (C) 2011-2013 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com
> * Author: Keshava Munegowda <keshava_mgowda at ti.com>
> + * Author: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
> *
> * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 of
> @@ -27,6 +28,8 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/usb-omap.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>
> #include "omap-usb.h"
>
> @@ -464,6 +467,37 @@ static void omap_usbhs_init(struct device *dev)
> pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> }
>
> +static int usbhs_omap_get_dt_pdata(struct device_node *node,
> + struct usbhs_omap_platform_data *pdata)
> +{
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "nports", &pdata->nports);
> + if (ret)
> + pdata->nports = 0;
Is there no upper bound on how many ports the controller can have lower than
4294967295?
I see there are several places in the driver that assume you can only have at
most OMAP3_HS_USB_PORTS (i.e. 3) ports. Is this expected to grow, or is the
hardware design capped at 3?
I don't seem to have usbhs_omap_platform_data::nports in my tree, and I
couldn't see it addded in any of this series so far. Where can I find a tree
with it present?
Is it a u32? If not, you'll need to use a temporary when reading the dt.
> +
> + /* get port modes */
> + for (i = 0; i < OMAP3_HS_USB_PORTS; i++) {
> + char prop[11];
> +
> + snprintf(prop, sizeof(prop), "port%d_mode", i + 1);
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, prop, &pdata->port_mode[i]);
> + if (ret)
> + pdata->port_mode[i] = OMAP_USBHS_PORT_MODE_UNUSED;
What if the port has an invalid mode value? What if something needs to be added
to or removed from the enum in future?
In my tree, pdata->port_mode[i] is an enum usbhs_omap_port_mode, not a u32.
Assuming it's the same in your tree. depending on what size the compiler
allocates the enum, you may clobber the other entries in the array (or data
immediately beyond it).
It'd at least be worth warning the user if there's a value the driver doesn't
understand.
> + }
> +
> + /* get flags */
> + pdata->single_ulpi_bypass = of_property_read_bool(node,
> + "single_ulpi_bypass");
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct of_device_id usbhs_child_match_table[] __initdata = {
> + { .compatible = "ti,omap-ehci", },
> + { .compatible = "ti,omap-ohci", },
> + { }
> +};
> +
> /**
> * usbhs_omap_probe - initialize TI-based HCDs
> *
> @@ -479,6 +513,21 @@ static int usbhs_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int i;
> bool need_logic_fck;
>
> + if (dev->of_node) {
> + /* For DT boot we populate platform data from OF node */
> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (usbhs_omap_get_dt_pdata(dev->of_node, pdata)) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Error getting platform data from DT node\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
This is currently unnecessary, as usbhs_omap_get_dt_pdata always returns 0.
It would be nicer if it error'd out on an invalid dt.
> + }
> +
> + dev->platform_data = pdata;
> + }
> +
> if (!pdata) {
> dev_err(dev, "Missing platform data\n");
> return -ENODEV;
[...]
Thanks,
Mark.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list