[PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common
Felipe Balbi
balbi at ti.com
Tue Feb 5 04:02:16 EST 2013
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:54:17PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:36:38PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >>> opted out of it. From the top of my head we have CPPI 3.x, CPPI 4.1,
> >>> Inventra DMA, OMAP sDMA and ux500 DMA engines supported by the driver.
>
> >>> Granted, CPPI 4.1 makes some assumptions about the fact that it's
> >>> handling USB tranfers,
>
> >> What CPPI 4.1 code makes this assumptions? MUSB DMA driver? Then it's just
>
> > HW makes the asumptions
>
> Not true at all. There is a separate set of registers (at offset 0) which
> copes with USB specifics, but CPPI 4.1 itself doesn't know about USB anything.
CPPI 4.1 was made for USB transfers.
> It's just the way the driver was written that it used both sets of registers but
> this needs to be changed into more abstacted accesses to the USB-specific part,
> to cope with it being different on different platfroms, like AM35x. The driver
> as it was last posted, just needs rework now.
are you saying you will do the work ?
> >> Don't know, I was quite content with the abstraction when writing CPPI 4.1
> >> driver for MUSB...
>
> > look closer. The whole:
>
> > if (is_cppi())
> > foo();
> > else if (is_inventra())
> > bar();
> > else if (is_omap_sdma())
> > baz();
>
> > is bogus.
>
> That part -- yes. There were attempt to get rid of this, but without changing
> the DMA API. It was left halfway done after my only critical comment, IIRC. Will
> we ever see the continuation of this effort?
patches are welcome
--
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20130204/9c8464df/attachment.sig>
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list