[RFC][PATCH 2/2 v3] ASoC: simple-card: add Device Tree support

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:09:37AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/30/2013 06:35 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I suggested this because it seemed more legible to repeat the
> > properties by having a named structure for each property rather
> > than by repeating them all with slightly different names.

> So the only need to repeat them at all was if the two DAIs needed
> different values for some of the properties rather than being
> identical (e.g. signal polarity) or precise inversions (e.g. which end
> is master), right?

There's more attributes that we might want to configure on the devices
than just the actual DAI link.  Clocks for example.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20130201/be5923e1/attachment.sig>