[PATCH v2 2/4] Thermal: exynos: Support for TMU regulator defined at device tree

[amit daniel kachhap]

On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> what is the status now?
> which one is preferred, this one or the one from Amit's patch set?
Hi Rui,

I have still not submitted LDO support in the TMU driver. I will
re-base Lukasz patches on top of my patch series and submit shortly as
his changes are also important.

Thanks,
Amit Daniel


>
> thanks,
> rui
>
>
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 18:29 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>> Hi Eduardo,
>>
>> > Amit, Lukasz,
>> >
>> > On 25-04-2013 09:29, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>> > > Hi Amit,
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Lukasz Majewski,
>> > >>
>> > >> Sorry for late review but I am currently working on restructuring
>> > >> the whole exynos thermal driver and this support of LDO can be
>> > >> added as feature as not all socs support this. This is also
>> > >> suggested by Eduardo. All your other patches looks fine.
>> > >
>> > > But this is how it is already done. The VDD_TS is optional, so
>> > > Exynos5440 and Exynos4210 will not be broken.
>> > >
>> > > This shall preserve the correct behavior of the thermal driver.
>> > >
>> >
>> > If you guys plan to move to feature based approach, like suggested in
>> > V1, then Id recommend adding a /* TODO: */ entry in your driver.
>>
>> Ok, nice idea.
>>
>> >
>> > Amit, are you including this LDO support on your rework?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html