[PATCH 2/2] thermal: db8500_cpufreq_cooling: remove usage of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()

[Russell King]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:19:08PM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 06:46:35PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:13:34AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/db8500_cpufreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/db8500_cpufreq_cooling.c
> > > index 21419851..786d192 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/db8500_cpufreq_cooling.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/db8500_cpufreq_cooling.c
> > > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int db8500_cpufreq_cooling_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	cpumask_set_cpu(0, &mask_val);
> > >  	cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(&mask_val);
> > >  
> > > -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cdev)) {
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
> > >  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register cooling device\n");
> > >  		return PTR_ERR(cdev);
> > 
> > Correct.  cpufreq_cooling_register() returns either an error-pointer or
> > a valid pointer.
> 
> Acked-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri at linaro.org>
> 
> ...but more of these are going to appear forever, was the proposed
> removal of IS_ERR_OR_NULL rejected?  Can't find any new message about
> that on the list.

We first need to get rid of the existing users of it - I've got rid of
most of those in arch/arm - but it seems that I never pushed that in the
last merge window.

Really it needs the cooperation of everyone to make it happen across the
tree with everyone removing IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in their subsystem.  There
are currently 366 instances of this macro being used in the entire tree
which is far too many to even mark it as deprecated.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of: