[PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Add GPMC DT support for Ethernet child nodes
Lars Poeschel
poeschel at lemonage.de
Thu Apr 18 00:41:23 EST 2013
On Wednesday 17 April 2013 at 14:05:58, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
...
> Yes, in fact I just realized that for_each_node_by_name() expand to:
>
> #define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
> for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
> dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
>
> which means that it will search for a node with "name" on the complete
> DeviceTree and this is wrong. It should only search on GPMC childs.
>
> Could you please test the following patch? If it works for you I'll add
> a proper description and submit it as a PATCH.
I see discussion is already going on, I just want to report:
I tested the patch and it work as intended. Probing of the gpmc childs
succeeds on am335x with another ethernet node in device tree.
Lars
> From d8dab9ae9a0284f17553875c2fddd806d9f6ab2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez at collabora.co.uk>
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:50:30 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: only search for GPMC DT child nodes on
> probe
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javier.martinez at collabora.co.uk> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 51
> ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 files changed, 24
> insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> index ed946df..58e2415 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> @@ -1520,35 +1520,32 @@ static int gpmc_probe_dt(struct platform_device
> *pdev) return ret;
> }
>
> - for_each_node_by_name(child, "nand") {
> - ret = gpmc_probe_nand_child(pdev, child);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - of_node_put(child);
> - return ret;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - for_each_node_by_name(child, "onenand") {
> - ret = gpmc_probe_onenand_child(pdev, child);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - of_node_put(child);
> - return ret;
> - }
> - }
> + for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
> + if (child->name) {
> + if (of_node_cmp(child->name, "nand") == 0) {
> + ret = gpmc_probe_nand_child(pdev, child);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
>
> - for_each_node_by_name(child, "nor") {
> - ret = gpmc_probe_generic_child(pdev, child);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - of_node_put(child);
> - return ret;
> - }
> - }
> + if (of_node_cmp(child->name, "onenand") == 0) {
> + ret = gpmc_probe_onenand_child(pdev, child);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
>
> - for_each_node_by_name(child, "ethernet") {
> - ret = gpmc_probe_generic_child(pdev, child);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - of_node_put(child);
> - return ret;
> + if (of_node_cmp(child->name, "ethernet") == 0 ||
> + of_node_cmp(child->name, "nor") == 0) {
> + ret = gpmc_probe_generic_child(pdev, child);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> }
> }
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list