Query on pinctrl usage for DT nodes

[Tony Lindgren]

* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi at ti.com> [130415 01:30]:
> On 04/10/2013 10:34 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Yeah how about just change the pintctrl-single,bits register
> > naming to be register + bit?  Something like 0xdeadbeef.0 and
> > 0xdeadbeef.1 and so on.
> 
> Something like this might work I think. It is going to be a bit tricky IMHO
> since we might need span out new 'register' every time a device requests for a
> new pinctrl-single,bits for already used register in the
> pinctrl-single,bit-per-mux area. In this way we still can make sure that
> certain bit are only used by a single driver.

OK. If it's one bit per mux type register we should be able to create
the right amount of entries based on the submask in pinctrs-single,bit?

Regards,

Tony