[PATCH] of_net.h: Provide dummy functions if OF_NET is not configured
Guenter Roeck
linux at roeck-us.net
Tue Apr 2 06:01:00 EST 2013
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 01:44:24PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 01:19 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > of_get_mac_address() and of_get_phy_mode() are only provided if OF_NET
> > is configured. While most callers check for the define, not all do, and those
> > who do require #ifdef around the code. For those who don't, the missing check
> > can result in errors such as
>
> How about removing the ifdef from those callers?
>
That would be the next step, after/if this one is accepted.
If not, it doesn't make sense to waste my time.
Thanks,
Guenter
> Rob
>
> >
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/tsi108_dev.c:107:3: error: implicit declaration of
> > function 'of_get_mac_address' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/mv64x60_dev.c:253:2: error: implicit declaration of
> > function 'of_get_mac_address' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >
> > Provide dummy function declarations if OF_NET is not configured. This is safe
> > because all callers do check the return values. If desired, at least some of
> > the #ifdefs in the code can subsequently be removed.
> >
> > Cc: David Daney <david.daney at cavium.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net>
> > ---
> > include/linux/of_net.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/of_net.h b/include/linux/of_net.h
> > index f474641..61bf53b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/of_net.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/of_net.h
> > @@ -11,6 +11,16 @@
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > extern const int of_get_phy_mode(struct device_node *np);
> > extern const void *of_get_mac_address(struct device_node *np);
> > +#else
> > +static inline const int of_get_phy_mode(struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline const void *of_get_mac_address(struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > #endif
> >
> > #endif /* __LINUX_OF_NET_H */
> >
>
>
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list