[PATCH v9 01/13] usb: musb: dsps: add phy control logic to glue

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:04:15PM +0000, B, Ravi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:51:04PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:39:47PM +0530, Ravi Babu wrote:
> > > >> From: Santhapuri, Damodar <damodar.santhapuri at ti.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> AM335x uses NOP transceiver driver and need to enable 
> > builtin PHY 
> > > >> by writing into usb_ctrl register available in system control 
> > > >> module register space. This is being added at musb glue driver 
> > > >> layer untill a separate system control module driver is 
> > available.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta <ajay.gupta at ti.com>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Santhapuri, Damodar <damodar.santhapuri at ti.com>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Ravi Babu <ravibabu at ti.com>
> > > >
> > > > Kishon, you were adding a real phy driver for OMAP's internal phy 
> > > > logic on one of your patches and I believe this will 
> > conflict with 
> > > > your changes, right ?
> > > 
> > > Indeed. My final patch of that series removes some of the functions 
> > > from omap_phy_internal.c (which was taken care in the phy driver).
> > > >
> > > > How does this look to you ? Is this at least correct ? I 
> > suppose the 
> > > > correct way would be to actually have the system control module 
> > > > driver which we have been waiting, right ?
> > > 
> > > Correct. I think once we have the system control module driver in 
> > > place, we'll have everything wrt control module register writes 
> > > implemented in correct way.
> > 
> > So $SUBJECT will pretty much be thrown away once we have SCM 
> > driver, in that case it's best to wait a bit longer and apply 
> > this series once SCM driver is available and after your 
> > series too... you agree ?
> > 
> 
> Felipe, I am sure there are patches in this series[0/13], which are
> not dependent on this patch or control module, Can we pull in those
> patches (all dual instances support patches)? So that I can re-work
> and submit again? 

sure, will do, don't worry :-)

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20120904/2b4a964b/attachment.sig>