[PATCH v2 1/2] USB: dwc3-exynos: Add support for device tree

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:36:43PM +0530, kishon wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tuesday 16 October 2012 03:23 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:15:56PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >>This patch adds support to parse probe data for
> >>dwc3-exynos driver using device tree.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek at samsung.com>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
> >>index ca65978..d11ef49 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
> >>@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> >>  #include <linux/clk.h>
> >>  #include <linux/usb/otg.h>
> >>  #include <linux/usb/nop-usb-xceiv.h>
> >>+#include <linux/of.h>
> >>
> >>  #include "core.h"
> >>
> >>@@ -87,6 +88,8 @@ err1:
> >>  	return ret;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>+static u64 dwc3_exynos_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> >>+
> >>  static int __devinit dwc3_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct dwc3_exynos_data	*pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> >>@@ -103,6 +106,14 @@ static int __devinit dwc3_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  		goto err0;
> >>  	}
> >>
> >>+	/*
> >>+	 * Right now device-tree probed devices don't get dma_mask set.
> >>+	 * Since shared usb code relies on it, set it here for now.
> >>+	 * Once we move to full device tree support this will vanish off.
> >>+	 */
> >>+	if (!pdev->dev.dma_mask)
> >>+		pdev->dev.dma_mask = &dwc3_exynos_dma_mask;
> >
> >says who ?
> >
> >$ git grep -e dma_mask drivers/of/
> >drivers/of/platform.c:  dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->archdata.dma_mask;
> >drivers/of/platform.c:  dev->archdata.dma_mask = 0xffffffffUL;
> >drivers/of/platform.c:  dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> >drivers/of/platform.c:  dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = ~0;
> >drivers/of/platform.c:  dev->dma_mask = ~0;
> >
> >-ECONFUSED
> 
> dma_mask is set under some ifdef except for "dev->dma_mask = ~0;".
> However I agree with you for coherent_dma_mask case.

indeed. Should we try to patch that instead ?

Rob, should we set dma_mask at the driver or do you have a nicer way to
handle it ??

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20121016/449ebb28/attachment.sig>