[PATCH] i2c: i2c-gpio: fix issue when DT node greater than 1

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 10:59 Mon 15 Oct     , Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi Jean Delvare,
> 
> On 10/10/2012 10:54, Bo Shen wrote:
> >
> >Hi Jean Delvare,
> >
> >On 9/19/2012 23:54, Jean Delvare wrote:
> >>On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:28:04 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>>On 09/18/2012 07:15 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
> >>>>I add the debug info, and it give the following error without this
> >>>>patch.
> >>>>
> >>>>--<8----------------------------------
> >>>>adap->name = i2c-gpio-1
> >>>>i2c-gpio i2c.2: using pins 30 (SDA) and 31 (SCL)
> >>>>adap->name = i2c-gpio-1
> >>>>i2c-gpio: probe of i2c.3 failed with error -16
> >>>>-->8----------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>With this patch, it successfully registered.
> >>>>--<8----------------------------------
> >>>>adap->name = i2c-gpio0
> >>>>i2c-gpio i2c.2: using pins 30 (SDA) and 31 (SCL)
> >>>>adap->name = i2c-gpio1
> >>>>i2c-gpio i2c.3: using pins 90 (SDA) and 91 (SCL)
> >>>>-->8----------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>Yes, that explains why the registration fails, but not why this patch is
> >>>the correct solution to the problem.
> >>>
> >>>The problematic code appears to be:
> >>>
> >>>snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), "i2c-gpio%d", pdev->id);
> >>>
> >>>Instead, I think that should be something more like:
> >>>
> >>>adap->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> >>
> >>strlcpy(adap->name, dev_name(&pdev->dev), sizeof(adap->name))
> >> if anything, as adap->name is a buffer, not a pointer.
> >
> >I am sorry for late. I have tested with DT, it works.
> >
> >Please send this patch to fix the issue.
> >Thanks.
> 
> Ping?
> 
> Will you send this patch? Or, I send this patch and add your S.O.B,
> which do you prefer?

do it

Best Regards,
J.