[PATCH] of/i2c: support more interrupt specifiers
Bongkyu Kim
bongkyu.kim at lge.com
Mon Nov 26 16:11:27 EST 2012
On 11/21/2012 10:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 02:58 AM, Bongkyu Kim wrote:
>> This patch supports more interrupt specifiers for i2c client.
>
> Why?
>
If we are registering a device has 2 interrupts like the below,
i2c at f9968000 {
lsm330_acc at 1D {
compatible = "ST,lsm330_acc",
/* #interrupt-cells = <2> */
interrupts = <73 0x2 65 0x2>,
};
};
we can't use second irq(65) in a driver because of mapping first
interrupt only.
If second irq(65) is mapped, we can use by gpio_to_irq() function at a
driver.
So, I think that all interrupt specifiers should be parsed and mapped
if DT's interrupts property is allowed several interrupt specifiers.
>> Signed-off-by: Bongkyu Kim <bongkyu.kim at lge.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/of_i2c.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
>> index 3550f3b..c6d9b7e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ void of_i2c_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>> struct dev_archdata dev_ad = {};
>> const __be32 *addr;
>> int len;
>> + int nr = 0;
>>
>> dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "of_i2c: register %s\n", node->full_name);
>>
>> @@ -57,7 +58,9 @@ void of_i2c_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> - info.irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
>> + info.irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, nr++);
>> + while (irq_of_parse_and_map(node, nr))
>> + nr++;
>
> What's the point if you are just discarding the interrupt number? If
> this is needed, then shouldn't you fix i2c_board_info first?
>
> Rob
>
It is better that i2c_board_info will be fixed.
But, if it will be fixed, all i2c client drivers should be changed.
I think there're so many i2c drivers currently.
In my opinion, do not assign to i2c_board_info and just map for all
interrupts is the better.
Thanks,
Bongkyu.
>> info.of_node = of_node_get(node);
>> info.archdata = &dev_ad;
>>
>>
>
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list