[PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Mon Nov 5 11:22:30 EST 2012
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
<panto at antoniou-consulting.com> wrote:
> Assuming that we do work on a DT object format, and that the runtime resolution mechanism is approved,
> then I agree that this part of the capebus patches can be dropped and the functionality assumed by generic
> DT core.
>
> The question is that this will take time, with no guarantees that this would be acceptable from
> the device tree maintainers. So I am putting them in the CC list, to see what they think about it.
This is actually exactly the direction I want to go with DT, which the
ability to load supplemental DT data blobs from either a kernel module
or userspace using the firmware loading infrastructure.
g.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list