[PATCH v3 05/12] usb: chipidea: add imx platform driver

[Richard Zhao]

Hi Alex,

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:49:46PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at freescale.com> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:37:26AM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >> Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at freescale.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > This patch supports only the host-mode functionality so far.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at freescale.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> >> > Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen at freescale.com>
> >> > Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin at linux.intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
> >> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> >> > ---
> >> >  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt        |   20 ++
> >> >  drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile                      |    3 +
> >> >  drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c                 |  189 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 
> >> One comment: I was going to suggest dropping "13xxx" suffix from
> >> everywhere in the driver, maybe module names too, since it doesn't
> >> really add any value and people often mistype it, so maybe for the new
> >> code it makes sense to avoid it? ci-imx looks better than ci13xxx-imx
> >> anyway and same goes for ci_imx_probe() vs ci13xxx_imx_probe().
> >> Does this make sense to you?
> > I'm not clear with the history. Does Chipidea only have one IP?
> 
> As far as their USB controllers go, there are several versions with
> different features and register layouts, but essentially similar. I want
> to support all of them with this driver. As for the other IPs designed
> by chipidea -- I have no idea about those, but I don't think we should
> care.
Cleaning up ci13xxx will touch almost every chipidea driver files. Do
you want me to do it or ?

Thanks
Richard
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Alex
>