[PATCH] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >> while ((readl(...))&&  timeout-->  0)
> >>     cpu_relax();
> 
> As I understand loops_per_jiffy, this loop will take much longer than
> the 100 ms you defined above?

Not sure about much, but longer. The idea is that this is about the
error path so if we report -EIO with a slight delay - no problem.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20120515/c143b260/attachment-0001.sig>