[PATCH] ASoC: twl6040: Support for DT
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Tue May 15 01:34:14 EST 2012
* Mark Brown <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> [120511 06:12]:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:02:26PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>
> > Describing sub nodes, especially for big SoC is pretty useful.
> > It is as useful as doing that for board that are sharing similar components.
>
> The concern here is that the device tree you're writing here is clearly
> just a direct translation of the particular stuff Linux happens to use
> internally into device tree; this is similar to the thing with using
> hwmod in the device tree representation and omitting basic stuff like
> the register ranges.
I agree we should not omit the register ranges from DT. That is
hardware specific information that other operating systems possibly
need, and they don't have hwmod.
Regards,
Tony
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list