[PATCH 01/11] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Wed Mar 21 01:21:58 EST 2012
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:12:56 +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 03:51 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Grant Likely<grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
> >
> > Allow drivers to report at probe time that they cannot get all the resources
> > required by the device, and should be retried at a later time.
> >
> > This should completely solve the problem of getting devices
> > initialized in the right order. Right now this is mostly handled by
> > mucking about with initcall ordering which is a complete hack, and
> > doesn't even remotely handle the case where device drivers are in
> > modules. This approach completely sidesteps the issues by allowing
> > driver registration to occur in any order, and any driver can request
> > to be retried after a few more other drivers get probed.
> >
> > v4: - Integrate Manjunath's addition of a separate workqueue
> > - Change -EAGAIN to -EPROBE_DEFER for drivers to trigger deferral
> > - Update comment blocks to reflect how the code really works
> > v3: - Hold off workqueue scheduling until late_initcall so that the bulk
> > of driver probes are complete before we start retrying deferred devices.
> > - Tested with simple use cases. Still needs more testing though.
> > Using it to get rid of the gpio early_initcall madness, or to replace
> > the ASoC internal probe deferral code would be ideal.
> > v2: - added locking so it should no longer be utterly broken in that regard
> > - remove device from deferred list at device_del time.
> > - Still completely untested with any real use case, but has been
> > boot tested.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely<grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
> > [Cc list stripped in order not to get on people's nerves]
> > ---
> > drivers/base/base.h | 1 +
> > drivers/base/core.c | 2 +
> > drivers/base/dd.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/device.h | 5 ++
> > include/linux/errno.h | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Is this patch going to be included in v3.4 ? I can see it's in -next,
> but not sure where I could check if its really queued for v3.4.
> It would be nice to have it in v3.4, I've got already one more client
> of this deferred probe infrastructure.
Greg has sent it on to Linus for merging, so yes.
g.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list