[PATCH 2/5 v3] ARM: at91: sam9g20 add i2c DT support
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Fri Mar 9 16:26:00 EST 2012
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:50:32 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com> wrote:
> For now on use i2c-gpio driver on the same pin as the hardware IP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
> Cc: devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
> v3:
>
> update i2c binding (Rob comments)
>
> Best Regards,
> J.
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20.dtsi
> index 4b0dc99..072b2da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20.dtsi
> @@ -189,4 +189,17 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
> };
> +
> + i2c-gpio at 0 {
i2c at 0
> + compatible = "i2c-gpio";
> + gpios = <&pioA 23 0 /* sda */
> + &pioA 24 0 /* scl */
> + >;
> + i2c-gpio,sda-open-drain;
> + i2c-gpio,scl-open-drain;
> + i2c-gpio,delay-us = <2>; /* ~100 kHz */
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
gpio-driven i2c busses are inherently board-specific. Why is this
in the SoC include file?
Otherwise I think this patch series looks okay.
g.
> };
> --
> 1.7.7
>
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies,Ltd.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list