[PATCH 5/9] ARM: kirkwood: use devicetree for orion-spi

Jason Cooper jason at lakedaemon.net
Wed Jun 13 04:13:43 EST 2012


On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:04:33PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > +		spi at 10600 {
> > > +			compatible = "marvell,orion-spi";
> > > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > > +			#size-cells = <0>;
> > > +			cell-index = <0>;
> > > +			reg = <0x10600 0x28>;
> > > +			status = "disabled";
> > > +		};
> > > +
> 
> > > index fa51586..0942139 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/board-dt.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/board-dt.c
> > > @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ static struct of_device_id kirkwood_dt_match_table[] __initdata = {
> > >  	{ }
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +struct of_dev_auxdata kirkwood_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
> > > +	OF_DEV_AUXDATA("marvell,orion-spi", 0xf1010600, "orion_spi.0", NULL),
> > 
> > Isn't this ---------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^ defined somewhere?
> 
> Yes, there is a #define for this. However, in this case, i think the
> number actually tells you more. The dtsi file has the number, not some
> symbolic representation. Also, some platforms, e.g. Dove, have more
> than one spi controller. Having the number there makes it easier to
> see the mapping between the node in DT and the name used in the
> platform device. If we use the #define it means making an indirection
> via kirkwood.h for a human to see the mapping.
> 
> However, i can change it...

Nope, good point.  If no one else pipes up, leave it as is.

thx,

Jason.


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list