[RFC/PATCH 01/13] ARM: Samsung: Extend MIPI PHY callback with an index argument

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

Hi Laurent,

On 07/26/2012 04:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sylwester,
>
> On Friday 25 May 2012 21:52:40 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> For systems instantiated from device tree struct platform_device id
>> field is always -1, add an 'id' argument to the s5p_csis_phy_enable()
>> function so the MIPI-CSIS hardware instance index can be passed in
>> by driver, for CONFIG_OF=y.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki<s.nawrocki at samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park<kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/plat-s5p/setup-mipiphy.c              |   20 ++++++++------------
>>   arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/mipi_csis.h |   10 ++++++----
>>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/setup-mipiphy.c
>> b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/setup-mipiphy.c index 683c466..146ecc3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/setup-mipiphy.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/setup-mipiphy.c
>> @@ -14,24 +14,19 @@
>>   #include<linux/spinlock.h>
>>   #include<mach/regs-clock.h>
>>
>> -static int __s5p_mipi_phy_control(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> +static int __s5p_mipi_phy_control(struct platform_device *pdev, int id,
>>   				  bool on, u32 reset)
>
> What about removing the pdev argument, as it's now not needed ?

Indeed, it isn't useful any more. I'm not sure what I intended to
keep it for, perhaps just some sentimental reasons.. :)
Thanks for pointing out, I'll remove it in the next iteration.

--

Regards,
Sylwester