[PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x: add support for input supply

[Stephen Warren]

On 07/13/2012 07:50 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> There is multiple voltage input pins on device which
> takes the voltage input for different voltage regulator.
> Support to configure the voltage input supplied by
> different regulator for each regulators.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan at nvidia.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps6586x.txt     |   17 +++++++
>  drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c             |   47 ++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps6586x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps6586x.txt
> index ab17ef6..d156e1b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps6586x.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps6586x.txt
> @@ -9,6 +9,14 @@ Required properties:
>  - regulators: list of regulators provided by this controller, must have
>    property "regulator-compatible" to match their hardware counterparts:
>    sm[0-2], ldo[0-9] and ldo_rtc
> +- sm0-supply: The input supply for the SM0.
> +- sm1-supply: The input supply for the SM1.
> +- sm2-supply: The input supply for the SM2.
> +- vinldo01-supply: The input supply for the LDO1 and LDO2
> +- vinldo23-supply: The input supply for the LDO2 and LDO3
> +- vinldo4-supply: The input supply for the LDO4
> +- vinldo678-supply: The input supply for the LDO6, LDO7 and LDO8
> +- vinldo9-supply: The input supply for the LDO9

Hmm. The signal names in my data sheet are VIN_SMn and VINLDOn, so
having "vin" in just some of the property names seems a little inconsistent.

> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c

>  static inline struct device *to_tps6586x_dev(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  {
> -	return rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
> +	return rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
...
> @@ -351,7 +354,7 @@ static int __devinit tps6586x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
...
> -	config.dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	config.dev = pdev->dev.parent;

Those seem like unrelated changes, but I suppose it's fine.