[PATCH 3/4] OMAP: Define TCA6424 max number of possible IRQs
Linus Walleij
linus.walleij at linaro.org
Sun Jul 15 06:44:59 EST 2012
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu
<cmahapatra at ti.com> wrote:
> OK, but if your taking this patch through GPIO tree the better if the 4th
> patch is taken through it. TCA6424 fails if both the patches are not
> present.
If the situation is such they should be squashed into one since the
point after the first before the second patch is not bisectable.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list