[PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

Mark Brown broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Fri Jul 13 02:16:57 EST 2012


On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 07:13:37PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 12 July 2012 18:32, Mark Brown <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:

> > Well, simple conflicts aren't that big a deal...  However, Thomas
> > mentioned that in order to test this he merged the SPI tree into your
> > tree so perhaps there is also a dependency on the SPI tree?  If that was
> > just for good practice testing then I agree that the best thing is to
> > merge via your tree, otherwise we might need to think harder.

> There were no dependency on Grant's spi/next branch. It was merged
> just to ensure that nothing is broken.

OK, great - then the Samsung tree it is.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20120712/d20848c7/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list