[RFC PATCH] dtc: integrate gpp

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 14:12 Tue 03 Jul     , Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 03:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 06/15/2012 12:53 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
> >>
> >> I figured the easiest way to get named constants into dtc would be to
> >> re-use an existing C pre-processor implemntation. Surprisingly, I could
> >> not find many /good/ possibilities for this. I eventually found one called
> >> gpp. This patch is an extremely quick-and-dirty integration of gpp into
> >> dtc in order to solicit some feedback. What do people think of this
> >> approach in general?
> > 
> > David, Jon,
> > 
> > What do you think of integrating gpp (or is there some alternative that
> > would be better)? Does it seem a reasonable approach; should I work on
> > addressing the TODO items I mentioned in the patch, or give up on this?
> 
> Are there any comments on this? Thanks.

I'm looking for this too

can we have a clear statement on it?

Best Regards,
J.
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss