[PATCH 2/2] regulator: fixed: dt: support for input supply
Mark Brown
broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Wed Jul 4 20:58:39 EST 2012
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 04:12:53PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 July 2012 03:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:32:08PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >>In non-DT, the input supply is passed with the regulator_init_data
> >>through the fixed voltage config and it is filled in board files.
> >No, this is a legacy way of doing things. All regulators should be
> >moving to specifying the name in their descriptor except for supplies
> >that are power roots (which are often fixed voltage regulators).
> Then the input_supply should be set through the regulator init data
> "init_data->supply_regulator" rather than the desc? If yes then also
> I need to change the forthcoming patch for tps65910 and tps6586x to
> pass the supply_regulator through init_data.
No, exactly the opposite way round - it should be being set in the
descriptor. The issue with your patch was that it only allowed DT
systems to do this.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20120704/309ba428/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list